Ohio Politicians On “Vitality Mandates Examine Committee” Took $830,000 From Soiled Energy Companies
A wolf pack of in-state utilities and out-of-state petrochemical billionaires has attacked Ohio’s clear vitality law, threatening to kill clean jobs and wreak additional injury on the setting.
This attack is led by Ohio state Senator Invoice Seitz , who five years earlier voted for the regulation, however after accepting dirty energy cash compared the law to Stalinism. The latest step to stall and dismantle clean vitality incentives is the so-referred to as “Energy Mandates Research Committee,” or “EMSC.” The EMSC was established after previous failed makes an attempt by Sen. Seitz and other Ohio Senators to repeal or weaken the clear power regulation.
The EMSC’s latest choice to indefinitely stall laws promoting clear, environment friendly power and the jobs they produce, is a power grab by coal utilities paying dropping campaign contributions in alternate to the gutting pollution-free clear vitality jobs in Ohio.
A evaluate of Ohio campaign finance information reveals a few of the money behind these politicians’ assault on successful clean vitality incentives:
Quid Pro Coal: Dirty Vitality funding to Ohio politicians on the “Energy Mandates Study Committee”
Oil & Gasoline
ALEC, Clear Power, and Rigged Markets
The EMSC is stacked with politicians linked to the American Legislative Change Council (ALEC), the company invoice-mill whose state legislator members assist soiled power lobbyists forge laws rolling again clear energy incentives. A few of ALEC’s high “private sector members” include Koch Industries, ExxonMobil, Peabody, and Duke Power.
At latest ALEC meetings, many of these firms sent their lobbyists to rub elbows with state politicians and create template laws in conferences closed to the general public. ALEC facilitated the creation of several model bills meant to journey up the booming clear energy industry.
Legislators violate ALEC’s core mission of promoting “free markets,” giving their fossil gasoline sponsors a go and attacking incentives for their clear competitors on the expense of human well being, clear air, clean water and a stable local weather. ALEC’s cookie-cutter attacks on clean vitality have taken numerous shapes in Ohio, North Carolina, Kansas and a dozen other states.
Quid Professional Coal – What Lobbying Appears Like
Public emails lately printed by Vitality & Coverage Institute show Sen. Seitz recruited assist from utility lobbyists as he crafted SB 58.
The utilities gave the bulk of $466,218 to 12 politicians on Sen. Seitz’s committee, documented above. This includes firms instantly coordinating with Sen. Seitz, according to his emails.
Ohio utility companies — FirstEnergy, American Electric Power, Duke Power, NiSource, AES subsidiary Dayton Energy & Light, and the Ohio Rural Electric Cooperatives (OREC) — have been instantly solicited for input on Seitz’s clear vitality freeze bill, SB 58, a placeholder bill that preceded Sen. Seitz’s research committee. See this timeline, courtesy of Energy & Policy Institute.
Ohio Rural Electric Cooperatives is a part of an enormous consortium of smaller-scale electric co-ops known as the Nationwide Rural Electric Cooperative Affiliation (NRECA). NRECA is the highest contribution to nationwide politicians among all soiled energy interests, even outspending Koch Industries PAC. NRECA’s Ohio affiliate gave Sen. Seitz $4,250 in 2012. The subsequent yr, OREC lobbyists helped write Sen. Seitz’s bill, SB fifty eight, telling a Seitz staffer, “As we mentioned,nbsp;connected is urged language for inclusion in SB 58 with slight modifications.”
No such opportunities had been supplied to scrub power advocates in communication with Sen. Seitz, together with several small companies, the Sierra Membership and affiliates of unions just like the Steelworkers and AFL-CIO.
Seitz repeatedly dismissed an Ohio State College examine, commissioned by Ohio Advanced Vitality Financial system (OAEE), a gaggle of Ohio businesses advocating for clear vitality in Ohio. OAEE President Ted Ford warned Senator Seitz in a letter:
“[W]e can report that the outcomes [of SB fifty eight] are worse for ratepayers than we initially thought. The Ohio State University Study (model 2.0) finds that the bill is an enormous giveaway to Ohio utilities, and would price consumers nearly $4 billion between now and 2025. National The examine additionally finds the standards have already saved Ohioans 1.4% on their electric payments.”
A handwritten be aware on the letter, apparently written by Senator Seitz, says “more full fabrications from individuals with zero credibility.” The letter and handwritten commentary had been circulated by a Seitz staffer to lobbyists at Duke Energy, American Electric Power, First Vitality and others.
Seitz shot again a letter to OAEE and the Ohio Sierra Club, loaded with questions attacking the credibility and relevance of their data, additionally sourced from the Ohio State College Research.
It turns out, Sen. Seitz prefers his knowledge from out-of-state universities, financed by none aside from Kansas billionaire Charles Koch.
Koch College, Inc. – Utah State University
Ohio’s coal-burning utilities aren’t the only pursuits helping Seitz behind the scenes. The ALEC senator’s examine committee relied on information using dishonest measurements from professors at Utah State College (USU) in a division that has taken over $1.6 million from Charles Koch since 2005. USU is among the many Charles Koch Foundation’s top-funded universities.
It begs the query: Why would Ohio petrochemical engineering in kenya politicians look to Utah professors, financed by a Kansas billionaire, for petrochemical engineering in kenya the information on Ohio’s clean power and efficiency efforts
The Koch-funded Institute for Political Financial system at USU has produced a collection of reports that give politicians the dangerous knowledge needed to assault clear vitality. The Koch professors are USU, just like the Suffolk professors earlier than them, appear to be deliberately deceptive. Foundations affiliated with Koch Industries have backed these Utah professors in identical assaults on renewable vitality standards, in Kansas and North Carolina.
Disproved data aside, USU professor Randy Simmons hid his financial conflicts of curiosity in a nationwide op-ed for Newsweek.
These aren’t the one Koch-funded professors stepping up to the plate to bat against wind. Earlier than Utah, it was the Koch-funded Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University. And recently, Kansas College Professor Artwork Hall was caught taking payments from Koch to check the Kansas renewable vitality normal, not long before he instructed the Kansas legislature to erode the incentives. Corridor’s earlier job: Koch Industries’ chief economist.
Koch Industries’ executives are pushing “faux it till you make it” into the unknown.
Why the Freeze Makes Zero Sense
It is not the affiliations that matter a lot as the false data and backwards hype concerned.
The American Wind Energy Affiliation (AWEA), the U.S. wind energy commerce association, has revealed fundamental flaws in all three of those Koch-funded professors’ stories out of Utah State College. AWEA’s Michael Goggin:
As a substitute of only going back to EIA’s 2013 renewable price estimates like they did of their Kansas report, in their Ohio report they return to 2008 price knowledge to develop their estimate of how the cost of wind power compares towards alternate options.
No rationalization is provided for why they did not use EIA’s more recent 2015 and 2014 data, which present that wind vitality imposes no internet cost relative to typical sources of vitality even after eradicating the affect of federal incentives. After all, the authors may have also used recent data from actual-world market prices and located that wind energy provides significant net benefits for shoppers, as we did above. Instead, utilizing out of date information allows them to overlook how the cost of wind energy has fallen by greater than half over the past five years, as documented by both authorities and personal investor knowledge.
Jobs, decrease vitality payments, much less wasted power…frozen by Senator Seitz
Samantha Williams at Natural Sources Protection Council surveys the information that Senator Seitz refuses to simply accept:
As of 2013, Ohio was residence to over 400 superior vitality companies that employed over 25,000 Ohioans and was leading the nation in the number of services manufacturing elements for wind know-how and second within the number of solar tools suppliers. A report by the Pew Charitable trusts exhibits Ohio attracted $1.3 billion in private clear energy funding from 2009 to 2013. Equally, Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) reported that, simply prior to the passage of the SB 310 clear energy freeze, Ohio’s clean tech financial system had grown to support 89,000 jobs.
Unfortunately, much of that arduous-earned momentum was a casualty of the freeze as well as HB 483, which principally tripled setbacks for wind turbines and made future business-scale growth unviable.The renewable sector is particularly lagging, in the E2 report showing a scant 1.5 % job development in Ohio far lower than the nationwide wind and solar charge.
Pancake Politics: They Liked this Legislation in 2008
Sen. Seitz voted along with a large majority of Ohio lawmakers in 2008 to cross the clear energy legislation.