refined oil plant, natural gas closing price,installation, and service of petroleum equipment and convenience store,
Your Settlement With Hell…the Us
A Defense Pact between the USA and Israel is now (Dec. 1, 2005) being discussed between Washington and Jerusalem . . . what does this portend
A STRATEGIC AND ESCHATOLOGICAL Imperative
This week (ending December three, 2005) in Washington, D.C. the United States and Israel, after a three-year hiatus, resumed their Strategic Dialogue. That is differentvery completely different. Something much more important has commenced between the two allies dealing with the likes of a burgeoning insurgency fed by an Iranian President who insists that ISRAEL Must be WIPED OF THE MAP and a resurgent Syrian-Hezbollah-Hamas (Baathist Socialist-Shiite-Sunni) alliance whose intentions mirror those of Irans Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a World With out Zionism (Haaretz).
Israeli International Ministry spokesman Mark Regev claimed the Strategic Dialogue had damaged off for logistical reasonsnot as a result of tensions over upgrading Israels Harpy anti-radar aerial drones, initially purchased by China in the mid-90s beneath Ehud Baraks regime, were the actual trigger of the estrangement (Israel despatched the degraded drones back to China; ipso facto, its time to strategize (PINR)). Frankly, the US and Israel are harping about something else . . .
IRANS NUCLEAR PROGRAM Should be WIPED OFF THE MAP
Targeting March of 2006, IDF Army Intelligence Chief, Major Common Aharon Ze’evi, and Ariel Sharon have given official notification: Israel is just not apt to abide the diplomatic ineptitude of the French, Germans, and British with the Iranians in stemming the inevitable WMD and the supply methods now in place to meet the visions of Ahmadinejad, Osama ben Laden, and Zarqawi on behalf of Israellet alone the aspirations of democratic reforms long-established by Egypts Islamic Brotherhood (BBC)!
If by the tip of March 2006, the worldwide community (i.e. the inane efforts of the British, French, and Germans) doesn’t manage to make use of diplomatic means to block Iran’s effort to supply a nuclear bomb, there’ll no longer be any cause to proceed diplomatic exercise on this subject, and it will be doable to say that the international makes an attempt to thwart [Iran’s efforts] have failed, Ze’evi mentioned. (December 2, 2005, Haaretz)
Certainly, the pivotal Brits (perennial toadies of the US-Israeli Axis) don’t have any need to worry a politically defunct EU aghast at what an assault on Iran may engender throughout the Moslem Worldat least not in keeping with John Laughland in ICH:
Will an attack on Iran put unacceptable strain on Euro-Atlantic relations Will Britain be compelled further onto the horns of the dilemma it has striven to keep away from, particularly to be forced to selected between the US and the EU No. US and British policy has ensured that the EU will itself be in such turmoil over the next yr that it will be unable to reply in any meaningful sense to a new act of Anglo-American aggression.
Because the watch and see Israelis attain maximum vulnerabilitythe US-Israel special relationship may, just like the Syrian-Iranian Defense Pact of early 2005 (Fox News), evolveby necessityinto a way more sinister instrument of Western colonial imperialism. The Moslem Worldand assume not that I stereotype all Moslems into that worldis fixated, however the ineffective fringe of reasonable-secular Islam, upon the awful and inevitable prospect:
THE US-ISRAEL Defense PACT
This is a big enchilada to swallow; thence, we shall dismember this wildebeest in four stages: (1) The nature of such a Protection Pact; (2) The circuitous route through Israels historical past its taken; (Three) Allies behind the pact; and (four) The eschatological crucial embedded natural gas closing price within an final security agreement between the US and Israel (let alone the scores of nations who will signal on to such an association). No, I dont wish to sound presumptuously prophetic; nevertheless, if you still cant see the elephant in the image (having been mesmerized by the white crane taking a free journey atop the pacaderm) then let me disabuse you of your preposterous pigeon-imaginative and prescient perspective and get a bit stereoscopic: BEHOLD, THE ELEPHANT COMETH!
First, lets be clear, the aforementioned strategic dialogue between the USA and Israel is designed to put Iran on discover: The Elephant Cometh. Secondly, theres no need to cover the obviousnothing like placing the entire world on notice, for had been about to see the wave peak: The Sea Change Cometh!
Now, Herr Hitler in Mein Kampf said he intended to kill the Jewsgrief, he meant what he stated. Effectively, right this moment you’ve Radical Islamicists (who want little doctrinal platform from the Koran to launch their aspirations)double grief, they intend to Wipe Israel off the map. Subsequent, you’ve got the Commercial West, led by the political chutzpah of the USA and the shock and awe of historys most awesome navy machine ever to countenance the planetunder girded by the recalcitrant Bush Doctrinean amalgam of victorious democratic enforcement, buttressed by the Judeo-Christian-Evangelical-Zionist-Neocons, with the company elite picking up the rear, hoping theyll get the contracts from this hyphenated juggernaut and the oil from not solely Iraq, but in addition Iran et al.
Forgive, however at this juncture, the altruistic peaceniksyou know, the Air-head America Radio typeswho have the supercilious notion that a unilateral and instant pullout of American troops from Iraq and your entire Center East, along with preserving international accords and the like, will one way or the other regain American stature and alleged credibility on the planet. Look, lets just lower to the chase: The US Congress has spoken401 to 3. Had been staying put!
The Israelis and the US know that their strategic-particular relationship is not constructed on thin airbut upon a host of platitudes: Shared values; Judeo-Christian beliefs; Chilly Struggle allies; pioneer spirit (settlers); solely democracy within the Center East; over a million Israelis holding dual US citizenship (approximately ¼ of the nation); each are terrorized by terroriststhe similar ones; Israels identification with the West, ad nausea, ad infinitum. Whoops, and as the Moslem World sees it: Shared Western decadence and heretical religious affirmationsright smack within the midst of the 10/40 Corridor, the Holy Land which Saladin et all took fair and sq. from the Crusaders method back when!
Since the institution of the State of Israel, the deepening and strengthening of ties with the United States has at all times been a central, important subject in Israeli foreign and defense policy. On this context, the opportunity of establishing a formal defense pact with the United States has arisen once in a while . . . since the top of the Cold Battle and with the progress made within the peace process, some complex components have been added . . . it is evident that the nature of such a pact in the current interval can be considerably different from one through the Cold-Conflict era (Yair Evron, Jaffe Heart for Strategic Research-Strategic Assessment).
This only gets more specific . . . as Mr. Evronway back in October 1998outlines the explanations for such a Defense Treaty between Israel and the U.S. (minor modifying):
1. When Israel-Syria negotiations are resumed, a defense pact is more likely to serve as part of American compensation, offered in change for Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights, or inside the framework of American guarantees for creating a package of safety measures, which might undoubtedly represent a central element of such an settlement.
2. The subject of a protection pact might also come up within the context of the attainable leakage into the area (Be aware: Veiled allusion here to, on the time, Iraq, and assuredly Iran and even Syriamy edit) of nuclear materials or weapons from Russia . . . a defense pact would be more likely to average or preclude the development of dangerous situations.
Three. Assuming the peace course of continues, it is probably going that a regional safety system might be established; an vital part of this regime could be (predicated) on (an) Israeli-U.S. defense pact.
Again, Mr. Evrons perceptions concerning such a protection pact clearly grasps the general strategic understanding between the USA and Israel; nonetheless, in the event you wouldstrategic peculiarityof a protection pact occupies an above and beyond all Memoranda of Understanding, all parts of the existing strategic alliance between the 2, and, most positively, all existing military-cultural-religio affinities to wit:
The concept of a defense treaty arose again within the 1970s and in the 1980s. During the Chilly Warfare period, the U.S. considered Israel as a strategic asset and a stabilizing influence in the region . . . Israel clung to this perception within the hope that mutual strategic pursuits would function a foundation sturdy enough to formalize protection relations between the 2 international locations, regardless of the absence of a solution to the problem of the territories occupied in 1967. The 1982 Lebanon Battle and the continuation of the regional battle, nonetheless, prevented such formalization, and it appeared that the U.S. wouldn’t be ready to protect Israels borders if these borders included the occupied territories. In the absence of a formal protection treaty, Israels status was defined, for the primary time, as a Non-NATO Ally in early 1987. (ibid. Yair Evron)
Be very clearthe U.S. and Israel know perfectly nicely what such a Defense TREATY entails. Through the Peres government (and, who is aware of, appears like Sharon-Peres could have a authorities again if their Kadima party wins in March, 2006same time that Iran gets the bomb) in 1996 Israel pressed for just such an accord. However, that expectation was positioned on the again burner when Netanyahu took over as Prime Minister.
BARAK CLINTON AND THE Protection PACT
By no means mind, Ehud Barak, strolling around Camp David with President Clinton back in 2000 knew exactly the price of such a Methanol Recovery Column Defense PACT. Bruce Riedel, Clintons Particular Assistant for Near East and South Asian Affairs on the National Security Council spelled out the financial ramifications and parameters of the elusive pact in an article found on bitterlemons.org.
Riedel spent time with Baraks aides, Danny Yatom and Zvi Shtauber, in formulating the defense settlement and the compensation package that Israel would obtain in the event that they structured a peace deal with the U.S. Riedel related how the Israelis came to Camp David preparedthey placed a draft of the Defense Settlement on the desk together with an in depth listing of financial and security requests (Aluf Benn, Haaretz). Now, listen how Aluf Benn puts it:
According to Riedel, Barak wanted a contractual format for the strategic relations between the U.S. and Israel, which had developed considerably over the years however lacked a formal dimension. His proposal was to signal an agreement during which the U.S. would agree to return to Israels help within the occasion of future assaults and then get the pact ratified by the American Congress and the Knesset.
Is that clear sufficient O.Okay. lets spell it out:
(1) $15 Billion in American aidprimarily upgrading the IDF
(2) $10 Billion to compensate the Palestinians
(three) $10 Billion for building desalination plants in Israel, the Palestinian state and Jordan
Complete: $35 Billion
Ultimately, the befuddled Riedel pondered . . .
Two years after Camp David (2002) the tragedy of the missed opportunity that the summit offered is clearer than ever. Imagine a Center East with out the Intafada and with a peace settlement buttressed by an unlimited reconstruction fund, akin to the Marshall Plan that President Truman used to rebuild Europe after World Conflict Two (ibid. Aluf Benn).
PERES AND THE ELUSIVE US-ISRAEL PEACE PACT
Remember, the eighty two-12 months previous Peres has needed a US-Israeli Protection Pact for an extended timepositioning himself in the new Sharon-Peres Alliance supplies ample house to conclude such a pact.
Back in 1995 Dore Gold contemplated Peres US-Israel Protection Pact in Is a Mutual Protection Treaty Between Israel (and) the U.S. Wanted He cautioned:
Israel and the United States have already been allies with out an alliance. But taking the connection one step additional to a formal treaty Prior to now, Israel had no pretensions of having the ability to defend itself towards the Soviet Union; thus U.S.-Israeli ties complemented the IDFs independent army power. However in the context of an Israeli-Syrian peace treaty, a brand new strategic relationship may evolve right into a substitute for Israels self-protection functionality; with huge implications past the peace course of itself . . . the essence of a formal Israeli-U.S. alliance is the recognition that an assault on Israel is an attack on the United States itself. And if that’s the case, it can be argued that a treaty reduces the necessity for an independent Israeli deterrent capability. Why not rely upon the retaliatory power of American submarines in the Mediterranean The alliance may thus turn into a helpful instrument to get Israel to signal the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
WHY IS ISRAEL HESITANT IN SIGNING THE Protection PACT WITH THE USA
Attention-grabbing, isnt it . . . for decades Israel has gone it alone while more and more relying upon the USAs benevolence and strategic cooperation on many fronts . . . however theres at all times been that slight, but profound hesitancy to take the final leap into the Defense PACT A sample of conflicted Israeli leaders has repeatedly warned:
I dont advocate that any one in all us settle for as a substitute (for Israels positions within the territories) even entering NATO, international guarantees or American soldiers (Moshe Dayan, 1981)
No military is a substitute for the IDF in protecting Israels security (Yitzhak Rabin, memoirs) (Dore Gold, Jewish News Weekly, 1995)
Within the Middle East Forum for Selling American Interests Asaf Romirowsky mused (January, 2004):
Sharon’s deputy Ehud Olmert delivered a message that was clear. Israel should rely on its own potential to defend itself and not on international help. This accords with Ben-Gurion’s imaginative and prescient that the dream should fit the truth we reside in.
Certainly, now that full-blown negotiations have as soon as again commenced to conclude the infamous but ever-evasive Defense Pact with the Jewish Statewhich solely AMERICA can concludewhat does Israels defense industry must lose (Crimson Herring, August 17, 2005Israel Fears U.S. Protection Pact)
One must bemuse oneself with Shai Feldmans prognostications again in 1996 concerning The Future of U.S.-Israel Strategic Cooperation especially in mild of Americas pre-positioning of a minimum of Five Navy BASES in Israel correct (William Arkin, January 2005); along with a number of hundred thousand troops in Iraq and all through the region (whoops, CENTCOM forgot to determine these US bases in Israel on their maps again); coupled with Irans quest for WMD; and, finally, the persistence of the Hezbollah-Hamas-Syrian/Bathist troikalet alone the obvious ramifications of Bushs efforts to democratize your complete area!
The conclusion of a U.S.-Israel defense pact would clearly have various important benefits:
Clarifying and formalizing Americas commitment to Israel;
Making the U.S.-Israel special relations less reversible;
Enhancing Israeli deterrence and thus offering an added hedge in opposition to a deterioration of the peace course of.
But lingering within the Jewish psychic is Shais nevertheless . . .
It could erode the Israeli ethos of self-reliance and the constructive impact that this has had on Israels ability to mobilize its inside resources and on Americas willingness to assist Israel;
It could be tough to outline towards whom the treaty can be directed and under what circumstances it can be activated, notably below situations of an evolving Arab-Israeli peace processes;
It might embroil the U.S. and Israeli governments in a prolonged and doubtlessly politically pricey effort to achieve ratification of such a treaty by the 2 countries legislatures;
It’d increase the difficulty of nuclear proliferation in very stark termspossibly involving the U.S. authorities in quite a lot of interrelated debates such because the applicability of its prolonged deterrence within the Middle East and the continued rationale of concerning Israel as a special case in U.S. nuclear non-proliferation coverage.
There you could have it . . . A comparability of those advantages and drawbacks would seem to indicate that it would be natural gas closing price wise for the U.S. and Israel to refrain from adopting a brand new constitution for his or her partnership and as an alternative pursue enhanced strategic cooperation inside present frameworks (Shai Feldman, Washington Institute, 1996).
The exhaustive discourse/analyses by Yair Evron back in 1998 concludedin spite of all of the cons amongst the pros . . .
There are weighty arguments each for and against concluding a defense treaty between Israel and the U.S. Such a pact involves sure prices to Israel, however it’s more likely to amplify the countrys general safety and assure the particular relationship between the two countries, even when one of the components in the foundation of American support is weakened. The treaty would function one axis of stability within different regional-political-strategic buildings expected in the future. (Yair Evron, An Israel-United States Defense Pact )
There is but one nationand one nation alone which has all the time held a strategic relationship with Israel: The United States of America. There is only one nation with whom Israel would conclude such a formal, definitive Protection PACT/TREATYa nation Israel has so diligently cultivated militarily, culturally, and even religiously: The United States of America. The inexorable justification for this COVENANT this Settlement this Defense PACT will not be only inevitable, it is Obligatory!
HAPPY TRAILS TO YOU . . . Until WE MEET AGAIN
Well, this isn’t Goodbye. This is a component I in a 4-part series on Your Covenant with Loss of life Your Agreement with Hell! However why so metaphorical Why such an intimidating title to an in any other case comprehensible geopolitical realitydont all signs level on this direction Certainly they do.
For these of you who don’t grasp the eschatological ramifications associated with such a Defense TREATY-PACT, you can see the extra articles exceedingly potent and, on the one hand foreboding, but however they are going to exude hope and relief that such a TREATY between Israel and the U.S. will catapult us all into that final periodthat conclusive destinyproposed so way back to relieve humanity of its confusion, war, desperation, and inequity.
I depart you with Isaiahs poetryto fathom the unfathomable:
Fear and the pit and the snare are upon you, O inhabitant of the earth. And it shall be that he who flees from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit, and he who comes up from the midst of the pit shall be caught in the snare; for the home windows from on excessive are open, and the foundations of the earth are shaken.
The earth is violently damaged, the earth is break up open, the earth is shaken exceedingly. The earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall totter like a hut; its transgression shall be heavy upon it, and it’ll fall, and never rise once more. It shall come to cross in that day that the Lord will punish on excessive the host of exalted ones and on the earth the kings of the earth.
They will probably be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered within the pit, and will probably be shut up within the prison; after many days they are going to be punished. Then the moon will likely be disgraced and the sun ashamed; for the Lord of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem and before His elders, gloriously.
I will make justice the measuring line, and righteousness the plummet; the hail will sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters will overflow the hiding place. Your covenant with death might be annulled, and your agreement with Sheol (hell) won’t stand; when the overflowing scourge passes by, then you will be trampled down by it . . . it is going to be a terror simply to grasp the report . . . now due to this fact, do not be mockers, lest your bonds be made strong; for I have heard from the Lord God of hosts, a destruction determined even upon the whole earth (Isaiah 24:19-23; 28:17-19, 22).
Please view full article/graphics/hyperlinks @ http://www.the-tribulation-community.com